project WORLDVIEW copyright 2025 Home back to Choices We Make
a "Science Works" Daily Courier Column
the Daily Courier is the newspaper of Prescott, Arizona:
"Everybody's Home Town"
************************************************************************************************************
Worldview Watch issue #78
posted 11/3/2024 Information
Wars—A Report from the Local Front
previous issue archive of all issues
in the news: the Science Works column below was published in the Prescott Arizona Daily Courier
worldview related analysis by Stephen P. Cook, Managing Director, project Worldview
Worldview themes and related Choices are a key part of what follows are:
VALUING
HONESTY, LEARNING I
like sharing “Today I learned…” and later using my new knowledge
in teaching others. I’m
honest, value facts, and can distinguish between the role of genes and
memes in human evolution. I want to advance cultural evolution and shape
healthy worldviews
by promoting memes I value, and encourage learning from experience of
Reality.
Feedback
this provides can guide humanity adapting to its global environment,
promote worldviews associated with
better predictions, and encourage honesty. I value exposing lies /
deceit, countering false information, and teaching critical thinking
skills to others so they can do this. |
SPREADING
DISINFORMATION I’m
an imperfect human being, so I will occasionally lie. Given my ambition
and desire to “win,” I will spread false information if that’s
what it takes. Is this evil or sinful? I don’t know, but I do know
that long ago my ancestors lived in a “kill or be killed” world!
“What if everyone values the truth so little?” you ask. I’d say
we’re living in that world today and many of us are doing fine. (Note:
knowingly
spreading lies, computer viruses, deceit, etc.
|
another theme related to what follows: theme #36B: CONSPIRACIES
************************************************************************************************************
November
3, 2024 Information
Wars—A Report from the Local Front
by
Stephen P. Cook
The term “Info Wars” was popularized by a website run by Alex Jones,
one devoted to spreading fake news and baseless conspiracy theories—and making
money. Founded in 1999, its notoriety grew with claims the 2012 Sandy Hook
Elementary School shooting was “completely fake” and when followers began
harassing grieving parents of murdered children. By 2015, InfoWars.com was
fourth on a “Top Ten Worst Anti-Science Websites” list.
Both science and our legal system depend on facts established beyond
reasonable doubt. Courtrooms are where those peddling false claims face
consequences. Consider defamation lawsuits against Alex Jones, Fox News
corporation, Donald Trump, Arizona would-be politician Kari Lake, and former New
York mayor / Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani. They all have essentially lost these
lawsuits and have paid— or are wrangling over how much they will have to pay—victims.
And facts…Jones, facing jury awards of $1.487 billion in damages, declared personal bankruptcy in 2022. Last year Fox News paid Dominion Voting Systems $787 million. Shortly thereafter a jury found Trump liable for sexual (“forced digital penetration”) abuse and defamation of E. Jean Carroll. In January another jury ordered him to additionally pay Carroll $83.3 million. In late March, Lake—who recently appeared with Trump at a Prescott Valley rally— declined to defend herself and filed for default judgment in a defamation lawsuit brought by Maricopa County Recorder, Republican Stephen Richer. In the last two weeks, Giuliani, owing $150 million, was ordered to begin paying Georgia election workers he slandered. And Trump was hit with a defamation lawsuit from the Central Park 5—teenagers accused in 1989 and imprisoned for many years before they were exonerated—for lies he told about them during the September 10 presidential debate.
Many conspiracy
theories have no obvious victims and their inventors have not faced courtroom
scrutiny. Two examples: 1) Jewish
people were behind the 9/11/2001 attacks, and 2) the QAnon
conspiracy theory. The latter involves supposed patriot Q battling “deep
state,” Satan worshippers, child-molesting pedophiles, and
cannibals—typically all Democrats. What do these conspiracy theories have to
do with Prescott? The man widely expected to next represent us in the Arizona
Senate—Republican LD1 candidate Mark Finchem——“built his brand on
election fraud and other conspiracy theories ” according to Arizona Mirror
reporting following the Islamist terror attacks 23rd anniversary when
he went on a talk show with anti-Semitic host Scott McKay. Note: Finchem spoke
at an October 24, 2021 QAnon convention in Las Vegas.
Anti-science is not exclusively Republican territory—see a July 2023 NPR
story headlined “RFK Jr. is building a presidential campaign around conspiracy
theories.” My advice: “Voters beware. Electing politicians who spread baseless conspiracy theories and don’t
respect facts can empower them to thwart efforts to hold law-breakers
accountable.”
Conspiracy theories involving scientists and their relationship with
government are often laughable and easy to debunk to well-educated audiences.
But communicating reasons for skepticism to the scientifically illiterate can be
challenging. One example: that supposedly NASA faked the whole 1969 lunar
landing. Note: in recent years Prescott has had a special relationship with a
guy promoting this —he’s been called “our town celebrity” and
“enthusiastic flat-earther” See a YouTube video “Prescott’s
Oddity: The NASA Is A Hoax Truck” and my June 9, 2024 column for more.
Another example: the supposed “climate hoax.” As described recently
in the Courier, this involves scientists supposedly seeking to profit
from “the money river from government” by continually “pushing a man-made
climate change lie”. They are
“fear-mongering” since supposedly “the climate is fluctuating within a
normal range.” I disagree and offer three things.
First, no one disputes that climate naturally fluctuates. Over periods
spanning thousands to hundreds of thousands of years, solar energy received by
Earth varies in complicated, but well understood, cycles. Second, the warming of
the last 150 years cannot be understood as part of this. For details see “Why
Milankovitch (Orbital) Cycles Can’t Explain Earth’s Current Warming” on
the science.nasa.gov website. For a graph, see “Global Temperatures Over Last
24,000 Years Show Today’s Warming ‘Unprecedented’” on the
news.arizona.edu website. This is from University of Arizona professor Jessica
Tierney, a member of the world’s preeminent climate science authority: the
UN-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Third, for my responses
to readers comments and more, see “Courier Climate Dialogues” on the
projectworldview.org website.
Finally, two Hurricane Helene / North Carolina additions to my last column. First, PBS News reports “Lawrence Berkeley
National Lab scientists [preliminarily] determined that climate change caused
50% more rainfall” and “observed rainfall was made up to 20 times more
likely in these areas because of global warming.”
Second, the recovery effort has been complicated by conspiracy theories.
Notably, Alex Jones posted a video claiming the government aimed Helene at North
Carolina—supposedly to force people out so it could mine large lithium
reserves.
****************************************************************************************************************
comments? put Worldview Watch #78 in subject line and email feedback@projectworldview.org